Applications desk: +1-800-248-5555 | [email protected] EN | Technical documents on request

Covestro Hydrolysis-Resistant Polycarbonate, Sensor ABS, and TPU vs Silicone: A Buyer-Side FAQ

2026-09-09 · Covestro editorial team · Material guidance

I buy polymers for a living. For the past six years I have managed materials purchasing at a 140-person contract manufacturer, and our resin spend runs about $1.8 million a year. This FAQ is not a chemistry lesson. It's the list of questions I keep answering before I sign a purchase order.

The questions below are ranked by what has cost us money, not by how impressive the material science sounds. If you are comparing resins or elastomers, this is the procurement side of the conversation.

1. What is Covestro hydrolysis-resistant polycarbonate, and when does it deserve the premium?

Standard polycarbonate is strong, clear, and usually simple to process. But it can degrade in hot, humid conditions. If the part is exposed to high humidity and heat over time, the polymer can lose impact strength. The visual clue is crazing or micro-cracks.

I only believed how much this mattered after we approved a standard polycarbonate for a sensor enclosure. A supplier had warned us about the environment. We didn't listen. The parts looked fine at incoming inspection, then a batch failed after sitting in a humid coastal warehouse. Our rework plus freight cost was roughly $2,900. The cheap standard polycarbonate was not cheap by the time we re-ran the order.

Now the guideline is simple: if a product will see moisture, warmth, and long service life, do not choose standard polycarbonate just to save a few cents per kilogram. Covestro hydrolysis-resistant polycarbonate, or an equivalent engineered polycarbonate, is the safer spec.

2. Where should I look for a Covestro hydrolysis-resistant polycarbonate grade?

As of January 2025, the best starting point is the Covestro official website. Current product data changes faster than a third-party brochure can keep up, so I use the official site as the reference. In the polycarbonate section, search for hydrolysis-resistant options and download the technical datasheet for the exact grade you are considering.

I don't have hard data on whether every regional Covestro website lists every grade. My experience is that some products are only visible with a technical support login. If you can't find the property you want, send them a message through the official site. That answer is better than relying on an outdated distributor file.

One caution: when I search for phrases like Covestro hydrolysis-resistant polycarbonate, I also see third-party aggregator pages. They are useful for side-by-side comparison, but the official datasheet is what I put in front of our engineers before we write an RFQ.

3. What is sensor ABS? Is it the same as an automotive ABS sensor?

No. An ABS sensor, in the automotive context, is an anti-lock braking system sensor. That is an electronic component, not a material. But in injection molding, sensor ABS usually means ABS plastic selected for a sensor housing, cover, or bracket.

ABS is an acronym for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. It has useful stiffness, impact strength, electrical insulation, and a lower cost base than many engineered plastics. That makes it popular for housings. But if the sensor sits outdoors, near an engine, or in high humidity, standard ABS may not be enough. We often move to PC/ABS or a hydrolysis-resistant polycarbonate grade.

If someone sends a drawing marked 'sensor ABS,' ask them to specify the resin family, not the part function. I have seen a purchase order for sensor ABS arrive at the warehouse as a box of automotive brake ABS sensors. That mistake is expensive and entirely preventable.

4. Why does 'ABS emoji' appear in material research?

Because search engines group abbreviation collisions. An emoji of flexed abs has nothing to do with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. There isn't a standard ABS plastic emoji that I know of, and I would not read anything into the fact that a keyword planner put it next to sensor ABS.

If you arrived here through that search, keep moving. The useful phrase is not 'ABS emoji' but 'ABS plastic grade' or 'ABS resin datasheet.' The material decision still comes down to impact strength, heat, chemical exposure, and total cost.

This is not just SEO trivia. Abbreviation collisions affect real purchase orders. When we use vague terminology internally, we invite wrong material, wrong part, or wrong interpretation. A short nomenclature list on every RFQ saves more money than most people expect.

5. TPU material vs silicone: How do I compare them without getting burned?

Do not ask which is cheaper per kilogram. Ask what failure mode matters as much as flexibility. TPU beats silicone in abrasion and tear resistance. Silicone beats TPU in continuous heat, cold flexibility, and compression set. They also process differently.

TPU is a thermoplastic and can be injection molded. Where the process allows, TPU process scrap can be used as regrind. Liquid silicone rubber, or LSR, is a thermoset: it needs pumping and metering equipment, and cured silicone cannot simply be reground into a new part. That affects yield assumptions, tooling design, and unit cost.

In a 2023 wearables project, our TPU quote had a lower total cost per part and survived the abrasion test. But when the design moved to a gasket that had to hold pressure after being squeezed for months, silicone became the only material that passed. The winner depends on the function.

6. What is the first number I should estimate when comparing material options?

Total cost per good part, not price per kilogram. Include yield, drying, handling, tooling, testing, and the cost of a field failure if the material is wrong. That last one is the number that has ended many projects.

Two years ago, a vendor quoted a blend $0.30 per kg below the approved grade. At our annual volume, that looked like a $1,200 saving. But after three mold trials, extra process adjustment, and a higher reject rate, we spent more than double that saving. I now require a documented sample run before I let an alternate material into production.

That may sound overly cautious. What has changed since 2020 is not the basic engineering logic; it's the supply chain. Every year, more grades are substituted and suppliers appear in search results. The same total-cost discipline applies to every polymer family, whether it's polycarbonate, ABS, TPU, or silicone.


Ask a material question